Marie wanted to get in on the Sunday Bloody Sunday fun too, so here's some shots from one of her favorite film series: HELLRAISER!
Sunday, February 9, 2014
Friday, February 7, 2014
Friday Flashback: The Haunting of Julia (1977)
The Haunting of Julia (a.k.a. Full Circle) is one of those obscure films that failed to find an audience upon release but is still worth a look. In fact, I had heard about this film years ago but found it to be widely unavailable and just damned hard to find. I believe you can watch it on YouTube at this point, but it is now playing on Netflix instant watch so I finally sat down and took notice.
Two things warranted my attention to this film: its source material was from a novel entitled simply "Julia" by one of my favorite authors, the great Peter Straub. I read the book years ago as a teen but failed to remember key details and thought it would be quite nice to see how it was adapted. The second reason to check it out, for me anyway, was lead actress Mia Farrow. It's no secret that I'm a fairly big Rosemary's Baby fan, so naturally finding out she did something else within the genre was a coup for sure.
The film wastes no time getting to the matter at hand when we are introduced to Julia Lofting (Farrow), her husband Magnus (Keir Dullea), and daughter Kate (Sophie Ward). They're enjoying a quick breakfast before heading off to their daily activities. Kate suddenly starts to choke on a bite of apple, and the situation escalates from precarious to deadly in short order. Being unable to dislodge the apple has Julia attempting a desperate at-home tracheotomy which fails miserably and their daughter is lost.
Soon after, Julia splits with Magnus (as so often seems to happen after the death of a child) and buys a fully-furnished house across town. I got the impression that Julia is from money, and after witnessing a conversation between Magnus and his sister Lily I came to think Magnus was fairly determined to keep his husband title.
Julia however, is nervously content in her new abode, busying herself by decorating and spending time with her old friend Mark (Tom Conti). In an upstairs bedroom Julia discovers children's toys, eventually cutting herself accidentally on the cymbols of a toy mechanical clown. This seems to start something sinister, as shortly after Julia sees a young blonde girl in a local park and immediately thinks it is Kate. It isn't of course, and when she runs to where the child was standing she finds only a knife and a mutilated turtle. (Which obviously doesn't bode well...)
She begins to hear things at the house and immediately thinks it is Mangus trying to scare her into coming back to him. When she agrees to host a seance in her new house at the request of Lily, it's obvious there are other forces at work. (In retrospect, having a seance at your house after just losing a child borders on down-right stupid).
A group of seven assembles, led by the very quirky Mrs. Fludd, a medium. While conducting the seance, Mrs. Fludd becomes scared to death, and warns Julia to move out of her home. Before everyone leaves, one of the women falls down the stairs after apparently seeing something frightening. She won't say what it was and the subject is closed without further questioning.
All this and Julia stays in the house....
One day when Julia is out, Magnus snoops around the house, and after investigating a strange noise (as is always the case, that's Horror 101) he "accidentally" trips down the basement steps only to land on a broken bottle, effectively slicing his throat and bringing his annoying existence to a crashing halt.
When Julia is having tea with a neighbor, she questions her about the previous residents and is told that a woman and her daughter lived there until the girl's untimely death - from choking. Floored, Julia rushes to confront Mrs. Fludd, who returns her frantic pleas for information by telling her that it is not a girl that has died, but a young boy.
This leads Julia to do some investigating of her own, and finds a story in the local library about a young boy that was murdered nearby. To add to her shock, she soon finds out the young girl that died in her home had something to do with the murdered boy's death. Confusion and desperation meet head-on as Julia tries to unravel the mystery. And it seems anyone with any helpful information is later turning up dead.
The Haunting of Julia isn't a great film. But it's pushed to a bit loftier heights by its very good cast and some decent spooky atmosphere. It's certainly a slow-moving film, with a whole lot of nothing going on a lot of the time. But dismal, rainy alleyways and dark corners hold many dangers, and Mia Farrow with her wispy frailness never fails to evoke a vibe of imminent dread. It's not so much a haunted house film as it is a haunted parent film, as the death of a child is something one never gets over - making the parent left behind eager to hear a child's whisper in the dark, or see their ghostly form in the mirror; when in fact it's just the clicking radiator. Or your own face in the mirror. The mind plays cruel tricks sometimes.
But sometimes....just sometimes....maybe it is a ghost. A malicious, evil ghost in the shape of a child.
Honestly, The Haunting of Julia could use a makeover. I don't generally promote remaking a film, but this is one that never really took off and is ripe for a second go. (Though you'll never find anyone who is able to play the stereotypically weak character as well as Farrow.) But it could be a great film - with the right director and the right cast. And no CGI ghosts!
Surely Straub would be happy to see his story told once more, perhaps to a more mainstream audience and with a bit more meat on the (ghostly) bone.
Two things warranted my attention to this film: its source material was from a novel entitled simply "Julia" by one of my favorite authors, the great Peter Straub. I read the book years ago as a teen but failed to remember key details and thought it would be quite nice to see how it was adapted. The second reason to check it out, for me anyway, was lead actress Mia Farrow. It's no secret that I'm a fairly big Rosemary's Baby fan, so naturally finding out she did something else within the genre was a coup for sure.
The film wastes no time getting to the matter at hand when we are introduced to Julia Lofting (Farrow), her husband Magnus (Keir Dullea), and daughter Kate (Sophie Ward). They're enjoying a quick breakfast before heading off to their daily activities. Kate suddenly starts to choke on a bite of apple, and the situation escalates from precarious to deadly in short order. Being unable to dislodge the apple has Julia attempting a desperate at-home tracheotomy which fails miserably and their daughter is lost.
Soon after, Julia splits with Magnus (as so often seems to happen after the death of a child) and buys a fully-furnished house across town. I got the impression that Julia is from money, and after witnessing a conversation between Magnus and his sister Lily I came to think Magnus was fairly determined to keep his husband title.Julia however, is nervously content in her new abode, busying herself by decorating and spending time with her old friend Mark (Tom Conti). In an upstairs bedroom Julia discovers children's toys, eventually cutting herself accidentally on the cymbols of a toy mechanical clown. This seems to start something sinister, as shortly after Julia sees a young blonde girl in a local park and immediately thinks it is Kate. It isn't of course, and when she runs to where the child was standing she finds only a knife and a mutilated turtle. (Which obviously doesn't bode well...)
She begins to hear things at the house and immediately thinks it is Mangus trying to scare her into coming back to him. When she agrees to host a seance in her new house at the request of Lily, it's obvious there are other forces at work. (In retrospect, having a seance at your house after just losing a child borders on down-right stupid).
A group of seven assembles, led by the very quirky Mrs. Fludd, a medium. While conducting the seance, Mrs. Fludd becomes scared to death, and warns Julia to move out of her home. Before everyone leaves, one of the women falls down the stairs after apparently seeing something frightening. She won't say what it was and the subject is closed without further questioning.
All this and Julia stays in the house....
One day when Julia is out, Magnus snoops around the house, and after investigating a strange noise (as is always the case, that's Horror 101) he "accidentally" trips down the basement steps only to land on a broken bottle, effectively slicing his throat and bringing his annoying existence to a crashing halt.
When Julia is having tea with a neighbor, she questions her about the previous residents and is told that a woman and her daughter lived there until the girl's untimely death - from choking. Floored, Julia rushes to confront Mrs. Fludd, who returns her frantic pleas for information by telling her that it is not a girl that has died, but a young boy.
This leads Julia to do some investigating of her own, and finds a story in the local library about a young boy that was murdered nearby. To add to her shock, she soon finds out the young girl that died in her home had something to do with the murdered boy's death. Confusion and desperation meet head-on as Julia tries to unravel the mystery. And it seems anyone with any helpful information is later turning up dead.
The Haunting of Julia isn't a great film. But it's pushed to a bit loftier heights by its very good cast and some decent spooky atmosphere. It's certainly a slow-moving film, with a whole lot of nothing going on a lot of the time. But dismal, rainy alleyways and dark corners hold many dangers, and Mia Farrow with her wispy frailness never fails to evoke a vibe of imminent dread. It's not so much a haunted house film as it is a haunted parent film, as the death of a child is something one never gets over - making the parent left behind eager to hear a child's whisper in the dark, or see their ghostly form in the mirror; when in fact it's just the clicking radiator. Or your own face in the mirror. The mind plays cruel tricks sometimes.
But sometimes....just sometimes....maybe it is a ghost. A malicious, evil ghost in the shape of a child.
Honestly, The Haunting of Julia could use a makeover. I don't generally promote remaking a film, but this is one that never really took off and is ripe for a second go. (Though you'll never find anyone who is able to play the stereotypically weak character as well as Farrow.) But it could be a great film - with the right director and the right cast. And no CGI ghosts!
Surely Straub would be happy to see his story told once more, perhaps to a more mainstream audience and with a bit more meat on the (ghostly) bone.
Monday, February 3, 2014
Interview With Turkish Director Can Evrenol On His New Horror Short: BASKIN
~by Marie Robinson
Have you ever seen a Turkish horror film? Odds are your answer is “no” due to the country’s strict film distribution laws. On top of that, horror cinema is relatively absent, and the handful of films are do exist fare better as comedies. Istanbul based director Can Evrenol dreams of exposing the world to quality horror cinema, and is driven to see his newest film, Baskin, become the first mainstream genre film from Turkey.
Since Turkey prohibits their 18+ over films from receiving wide release, festivals are essentially the only international exposure Evrenol’s horror films get; but with perseverance he hopes to eventually find a sponsor who will give his film the wide distribution he craves.
Evrenol works on commercials to pay the bills, but his real passion is for the silver screen with a particular taste for the darker side of cinema. He has directed six short films, all of which can be viewed on his website, here (http://canevrenol.com/shortfilms/), with the exception of his latest, Baskin. Evrenol’s films pack a punch—if you were being punched by a baseball bat covered in exposed nails. Atrocious avant-garde, there is no shortage of on-screen slaughter, and don’t even think of praying for a cutaway, they’ll go unanswered. Innovative and disturbing, Evrenol often couples innocence and deviance, splattering any boundaries between them like a skull on the sidewalk. His 2010 short film To My Mother and Father won such awards as Best Short Film of the Year (Boston Underground), Best Lovecraftian Short Film (A Night of Horror), and Most Disturbing Short Film (HP Lovecraft Festival).
Evrenol’s latest, Baskin, was featured at last year’s Fantastic Fest where it was received with bloodcurdling screams (the good kind). It follows a troupe of policemen who receive the call-in from hell. Within a derelict building they find a satanic den where all manners of atrocities are seemingly performed and the most diabolical creatures reside. Tense and terrifying, Evrenol’s quick tour through hell is one of visual splendor. Baskin may only be eleven minutes but one could easily find themselves watching half of it through their fingers. It is a story that I would love to see fleshed out into a feature film. I had the pleasure of speaking with Can Evrenol about the possibility of such a wonderful, nightmarish thing coming to be, among other things:
What does Baskin mean?
Turkish for 'The Raid'. It was the working title, but it stuck. I loved the way it sounded. I didn't want another 'The Raid' in festival circuit, so I thought of just keeping the international title the same as the Turkish title. A good friend Ryan Haysom, director of 'Yellow: A Neo Giallo', said in his feedback that it sounds ancient and Lovecraftian. That was it! I kept it.
It does have an Old Ones ring about it. There is overt evidence of Lovecraft inspiration in several of your films. Who are some of your other influences?
Veerhoeven, Cronenberg, Lynch, and Kubrick are some of my favorite directors that immediately come to my mind when asked. Unfortunately I wasn't introduced to Lovecraft until the age of 25. My first ever memory of 'horror literature' is probably an early 80's animation of Swan Lake. I remember I was fascinated and terrified when I heard Tchaikovsky's music fade in for the first time! My inspiration comes in many mediums of literature, be it computer games, or graphic novels - and of course the most horrifying of them all, life itself.
Your talent and ambition is solidifying you as an important filmmaker not only to your country, but to the genre, as well. How did you find your place in horror, and what brought you to the decision to make horror movies?
Well, thank you! It's great to hear such kind words coming from you. I think it all happened when I shot my second short film 'The Chest'. I was watching plenty of Fulci, Romero, listening to Slayer and reading Lovecraft at the time. But even before that, one can say my first short film 'Screws' is a dark adaptation of one of my favorite Turkish short stories. And even way before that, when I was 7, I was in love with the cassette covers of Iron Maiden, Manowar and Over Kill.
Have you ever thought of relocating?
I was based in the UK for about 9 years. I loved it. But every city in the world has its pros and cons when compared to the crazy, crazy Istanbul. It's a beautiful city. Especially when you grow up here all your life and build your whole network around it. But it's also disturbing and things keep getting darker and darker lately. I recently returned here where I pay the bills by shooting TV commercials, and most importantly where I'm most resourceful.
What is next for you? Any plans for a feature film?
I struggled to find sponsors for a horror feature film here for 2 years after the success of my short film 'To My Mother and Father' in 2010. But to no avail. I dropped it. Then came 'Baskin'. It too became successful in Fantastic Fest and Sitges. Eli Roth and Richard Stanley loved it in Sitges. I had priceless feedback. It is also successful here at home. It is nominated as the best short film to SIYAD, Turkey's most prestigious film critics' award.
But still, it seems impossible to find any sponsors for Baskin The Motion Picture. It will be in Turkish language, so foreign sponsors are distant to it. Censorship and conservatism in Turkey is growing more extreme and more illogical day by day. A wide cinematic release would be a miracle. Although films like Hills Have Eyes, Texas Chainsaw, or Martyrs do get small cinematic releases here, a Turkish film could draw more heat and therefore can have less of a chance for a wide release. Funding by the ministry of culture with the content at hand is out of question. There are no respectable Turkish horror films to follow. Neither sponsors, nor serious filmmakers touch it with a 10 feet pole. It seems impossible to meet a fellow like-minded private Turkish money man who would invest in a crazy horror picture. So it seems like a dead end.
But I do have a hunch that all these negative circumstances can work for the film when it
gets made, and it can have a huge reputation for being so crazy in such a political and cultural atmosphere! That will be the uniqueness of it.
I do have a new plan now. Currently I'm in the works for shooting a non-horror feature film this summer. And I hope to use the money I make from this film, for making Baskin the Motion Picture, next year. Fingers crossed.
*Keep an eye out for Can Evrenol, and in the meantime, watch the trailer for Baskin below.
http://vimeo.com/71899005
Have you ever seen a Turkish horror film? Odds are your answer is “no” due to the country’s strict film distribution laws. On top of that, horror cinema is relatively absent, and the handful of films are do exist fare better as comedies. Istanbul based director Can Evrenol dreams of exposing the world to quality horror cinema, and is driven to see his newest film, Baskin, become the first mainstream genre film from Turkey.
Since Turkey prohibits their 18+ over films from receiving wide release, festivals are essentially the only international exposure Evrenol’s horror films get; but with perseverance he hopes to eventually find a sponsor who will give his film the wide distribution he craves.
Evrenol works on commercials to pay the bills, but his real passion is for the silver screen with a particular taste for the darker side of cinema. He has directed six short films, all of which can be viewed on his website, here (http://canevrenol.com/shortfilms/), with the exception of his latest, Baskin. Evrenol’s films pack a punch—if you were being punched by a baseball bat covered in exposed nails. Atrocious avant-garde, there is no shortage of on-screen slaughter, and don’t even think of praying for a cutaway, they’ll go unanswered. Innovative and disturbing, Evrenol often couples innocence and deviance, splattering any boundaries between them like a skull on the sidewalk. His 2010 short film To My Mother and Father won such awards as Best Short Film of the Year (Boston Underground), Best Lovecraftian Short Film (A Night of Horror), and Most Disturbing Short Film (HP Lovecraft Festival).
Evrenol’s latest, Baskin, was featured at last year’s Fantastic Fest where it was received with bloodcurdling screams (the good kind). It follows a troupe of policemen who receive the call-in from hell. Within a derelict building they find a satanic den where all manners of atrocities are seemingly performed and the most diabolical creatures reside. Tense and terrifying, Evrenol’s quick tour through hell is one of visual splendor. Baskin may only be eleven minutes but one could easily find themselves watching half of it through their fingers. It is a story that I would love to see fleshed out into a feature film. I had the pleasure of speaking with Can Evrenol about the possibility of such a wonderful, nightmarish thing coming to be, among other things:
What does Baskin mean?
Turkish for 'The Raid'. It was the working title, but it stuck. I loved the way it sounded. I didn't want another 'The Raid' in festival circuit, so I thought of just keeping the international title the same as the Turkish title. A good friend Ryan Haysom, director of 'Yellow: A Neo Giallo', said in his feedback that it sounds ancient and Lovecraftian. That was it! I kept it.
It does have an Old Ones ring about it. There is overt evidence of Lovecraft inspiration in several of your films. Who are some of your other influences?
Veerhoeven, Cronenberg, Lynch, and Kubrick are some of my favorite directors that immediately come to my mind when asked. Unfortunately I wasn't introduced to Lovecraft until the age of 25. My first ever memory of 'horror literature' is probably an early 80's animation of Swan Lake. I remember I was fascinated and terrified when I heard Tchaikovsky's music fade in for the first time! My inspiration comes in many mediums of literature, be it computer games, or graphic novels - and of course the most horrifying of them all, life itself.
Your talent and ambition is solidifying you as an important filmmaker not only to your country, but to the genre, as well. How did you find your place in horror, and what brought you to the decision to make horror movies?
Well, thank you! It's great to hear such kind words coming from you. I think it all happened when I shot my second short film 'The Chest'. I was watching plenty of Fulci, Romero, listening to Slayer and reading Lovecraft at the time. But even before that, one can say my first short film 'Screws' is a dark adaptation of one of my favorite Turkish short stories. And even way before that, when I was 7, I was in love with the cassette covers of Iron Maiden, Manowar and Over Kill.
Have you ever thought of relocating?
I was based in the UK for about 9 years. I loved it. But every city in the world has its pros and cons when compared to the crazy, crazy Istanbul. It's a beautiful city. Especially when you grow up here all your life and build your whole network around it. But it's also disturbing and things keep getting darker and darker lately. I recently returned here where I pay the bills by shooting TV commercials, and most importantly where I'm most resourceful.
What is next for you? Any plans for a feature film?
I struggled to find sponsors for a horror feature film here for 2 years after the success of my short film 'To My Mother and Father' in 2010. But to no avail. I dropped it. Then came 'Baskin'. It too became successful in Fantastic Fest and Sitges. Eli Roth and Richard Stanley loved it in Sitges. I had priceless feedback. It is also successful here at home. It is nominated as the best short film to SIYAD, Turkey's most prestigious film critics' award.
But still, it seems impossible to find any sponsors for Baskin The Motion Picture. It will be in Turkish language, so foreign sponsors are distant to it. Censorship and conservatism in Turkey is growing more extreme and more illogical day by day. A wide cinematic release would be a miracle. Although films like Hills Have Eyes, Texas Chainsaw, or Martyrs do get small cinematic releases here, a Turkish film could draw more heat and therefore can have less of a chance for a wide release. Funding by the ministry of culture with the content at hand is out of question. There are no respectable Turkish horror films to follow. Neither sponsors, nor serious filmmakers touch it with a 10 feet pole. It seems impossible to meet a fellow like-minded private Turkish money man who would invest in a crazy horror picture. So it seems like a dead end.
But I do have a hunch that all these negative circumstances can work for the film when it
gets made, and it can have a huge reputation for being so crazy in such a political and cultural atmosphere! That will be the uniqueness of it.
I do have a new plan now. Currently I'm in the works for shooting a non-horror feature film this summer. And I hope to use the money I make from this film, for making Baskin the Motion Picture, next year. Fingers crossed.
*Keep an eye out for Can Evrenol, and in the meantime, watch the trailer for Baskin below.
http://vimeo.com/71899005
Sunday, February 2, 2014
Sunday, January 26, 2014
Sunday, January 19, 2014
Sunday Bloody Sunday: À l'intérieur Edition
(Because it sounded ridiculous to say "Inside Edition", I chose to use the French title.)
Poor Sarah (Alysson Paradis) - she really had a horrible Christmas.
Poor Sarah (Alysson Paradis) - she really had a horrible Christmas.
Labels:
À l'intérieur,
Inside,
Sunday Bloody Sunday
Tuesday, January 14, 2014
The Banshee Chapter (2013): Drugs And Techno Don't Mix, But Create Great Suspense!
Review by Marie Robinson
I had good feelings about The Banshee Chapter (a.k.a. simply Banshee Chapter) from the moment I heard about it, and my gut was not wrong.
The
film begins with footage of James Hirsch (Michael McMillian, True
Blood), an aspiring writer who becomes fascinated with an alleged
hallucinogenic drug that the U.S. government once tested on unwitting
patients, with disturbing results that have been kept secret ever since.
James acquires the drug, which is described as a pure—and therefore
much more potent—batch of Dimethyltryptamine (DMT) from “friends in
Colorado” and gets a buddy of his to film him as he ingests it. It isn’t
long until James and his sober friend are visited by some mysterious
malevolent entity, which results in the disappearance of the pair.
After hearing about the incident, old college friend and investigative journalist Anne Roland (Katia Winter, Sleepy Hollow) decides to embark on a mission to uncover the truth not only about James’ disappearance, but also the truth about the drug. Nothing could ever prepare her for what she finds, which include sinister government experiment tapes, cryptic radio broadcasts, and the horror of the cosmos. She is joined by a Hunter S. Thompson-esque character named Thomas Blackburn (Ted Levine, The Silence of the Lambs) who can help her piece together the rest of the mystery; but finding the answers could be deadly.
Dimethyltryptamine, also known as DMT, is a hallucinogen that when ingested offers an intense and immersive experience. While on the drug one may feel completely separate from reality, and many have reported seeing strange, celestial beings. There is a subculture that believes that these sights and experiences are not merely hallucinations, but actual transcendence. Such was the subject of the 2010 documentary DMT: The Spirit Molecule. DMT is found commonly in mammals, and has been located in the human brain where it acts as a neurotransmitter. Since DMT has been discovered in the pineal gland, it is thought to be one of the chemicals released when one dreams… and dies.
A few years ago a friend of mine turned me on to a very peculiar variety of shortwave radio broadcasts called “number stations”. Number stations are characterized by an artificial voice reciting numbers and/or letters. The voice, played only against crackling static, is more often than not female, and sometimes sounds like that of a child. Sometimes the voice gives way to a stream of choppy music that sounds similar to me like that of an ice cream truck. The nature of these encoded broadcasts is essentially unknown, but is often speculated as being government-run stations used to transmit messages to spies. Whatever they really are, they are downright eerie.
The Banshee Chapter is an impressive directorial debut from Blair Erickson that incorporates elements from both found footage and mockumentary subgenres in an intriguing and creative way. The film is smart, entertaining, and—oh, yes—scary. There were plenty of chilling moments that had my skin crawling, and I jumped out of my seat more than once. The story is not only presented in a stimulating way, it is also a compelling story with feelings of Arthur Machen’s “The Great God Pan” and overtones of H.P. Lovecraft. A particular story of Lovecraft’s, “From Beyond”, is directly referenced in the film, but the similarities go deeper than just that.
Treat yourself to something different than all those possession films flooding the box office, and maybe even get unnerved by The Banshee Chapter.
*And below is a sample of one of the many "numbers stations" out there....
I had good feelings about The Banshee Chapter (a.k.a. simply Banshee Chapter) from the moment I heard about it, and my gut was not wrong.
The
film begins with footage of James Hirsch (Michael McMillian, True
Blood), an aspiring writer who becomes fascinated with an alleged
hallucinogenic drug that the U.S. government once tested on unwitting
patients, with disturbing results that have been kept secret ever since.
James acquires the drug, which is described as a pure—and therefore
much more potent—batch of Dimethyltryptamine (DMT) from “friends in
Colorado” and gets a buddy of his to film him as he ingests it. It isn’t
long until James and his sober friend are visited by some mysterious
malevolent entity, which results in the disappearance of the pair.After hearing about the incident, old college friend and investigative journalist Anne Roland (Katia Winter, Sleepy Hollow) decides to embark on a mission to uncover the truth not only about James’ disappearance, but also the truth about the drug. Nothing could ever prepare her for what she finds, which include sinister government experiment tapes, cryptic radio broadcasts, and the horror of the cosmos. She is joined by a Hunter S. Thompson-esque character named Thomas Blackburn (Ted Levine, The Silence of the Lambs) who can help her piece together the rest of the mystery; but finding the answers could be deadly.
Dimethyltryptamine, also known as DMT, is a hallucinogen that when ingested offers an intense and immersive experience. While on the drug one may feel completely separate from reality, and many have reported seeing strange, celestial beings. There is a subculture that believes that these sights and experiences are not merely hallucinations, but actual transcendence. Such was the subject of the 2010 documentary DMT: The Spirit Molecule. DMT is found commonly in mammals, and has been located in the human brain where it acts as a neurotransmitter. Since DMT has been discovered in the pineal gland, it is thought to be one of the chemicals released when one dreams… and dies.
A few years ago a friend of mine turned me on to a very peculiar variety of shortwave radio broadcasts called “number stations”. Number stations are characterized by an artificial voice reciting numbers and/or letters. The voice, played only against crackling static, is more often than not female, and sometimes sounds like that of a child. Sometimes the voice gives way to a stream of choppy music that sounds similar to me like that of an ice cream truck. The nature of these encoded broadcasts is essentially unknown, but is often speculated as being government-run stations used to transmit messages to spies. Whatever they really are, they are downright eerie.
The Banshee Chapter is an impressive directorial debut from Blair Erickson that incorporates elements from both found footage and mockumentary subgenres in an intriguing and creative way. The film is smart, entertaining, and—oh, yes—scary. There were plenty of chilling moments that had my skin crawling, and I jumped out of my seat more than once. The story is not only presented in a stimulating way, it is also a compelling story with feelings of Arthur Machen’s “The Great God Pan” and overtones of H.P. Lovecraft. A particular story of Lovecraft’s, “From Beyond”, is directly referenced in the film, but the similarities go deeper than just that.
Treat yourself to something different than all those possession films flooding the box office, and maybe even get unnerved by The Banshee Chapter.
*And below is a sample of one of the many "numbers stations" out there....
Labels:
Banshee Chapter,
Marie,
The Banshee Chapter
Sunday, January 12, 2014
Sunday Bloody Sunday: Evil Dead (2013) Edition
So here's one of the first new theme weeks:
Friday, January 10, 2014
We Are What We Are (2013): And Today's Special Is.......
I've expressed my undying indifference to remakes many times in the past on this very blog, even trashed several along the way. And though I'm always hoping against hope for filmmakers to come up with original ideas (i.e. Jug Face, thank you very much!), I have witnessed some very good - perhaps even excellent - remakes over the years.
Movies such as The Thing (1982), Dawn of the Dead (2004), Invasion of the Body Snatchers (1978), The Fly (1986)...all of these are downright smashingly great, there's no doubt. And even to some extent, films like 2010's Let Me In showed that a re-envisioning of a movie can work, even if it's only a few years since the film has been done.
I do tend to find that sometimes if the film is foreign it's easier to experience as a remake, as Let Me In did, as well as a film from this past year that is ending up on quite a few year-end honors lists, with good reason.
We Are What We Are, directed by Jim Mickle (Stake Land, Mulberry Street), is a prime example of how to do a remake right. I was so impressed with this film from start to finish. It presents a subject so taboo in such a way that we ultimately feel sorry for the family involved, and truly hope it all works out - when in reality we should be locking them up and throwing away the key.
If you've already seen the first-rate original, then you'll know what subject I'm talking about. I don't think I'm giving anything away by telling you that the Parker family has a disturbing secret. A fairly nasty one that is steeped in their family's old-time traditions and apparently one that they (at least the father) are unwilling to deviate from.
Suffice it to say, daughters Iris (Ambyr Childers) and Rose (Julia Garner) are becoming increasingly more disenchanted with the family's customs and even more so when tragedy befalls their mother as she gathers supplies at the local market. She suffers what appears to be a stroke and meanders outside the store. Meanwhile, a serious rainstorm whips through the small town, causing flash flooding. In her confusion, she slips and falls, hitting her head and lands in a drainage ditch that swiftly fills with water, effectively drowning her in quick order.
Even as the family grieves, Iris, as the eldest child, is expected to assume the matriarchal duties of the household. This includes preparing the family meals - which unfortunately does not consist of just opening a box of Kraft macaroni & cheese. As her father Frank (Bill Sage) spews his religious bullshit and directs his impressionable younger not to be afraid and to follow Jesus, Iris is busy getting reacquainted with a local boy she went to school with who is now the sheriff's deputy.
As the Parker family grieves and makes their own special blend of homemade soup, the town doctor begins to investigate and furthermore becomes suspicious after his dog uncovers a bone that has washed up from the constant deluge plaguing the town. Naturally, it's not an animal bone, causing Doctor Barrow (the always impeccable Michael Parks, Red State) to realize there's something fishy going on in his little town. Add in the fact that there have been several people that have gone missing within a thirty mile radius of the town over the years (including the Doctor's own daughter), and he is forced to consider what the facts are blatantly telling him. He also discovers something else too bizarre to comprehend. The Parker family mother, upon autopsy, was showing signs of a rare disease known as Kuru - which is prevalent only in tribal regions of Papua New Guinea.
Google it, people.
We Are What We Are is honestly fantastic. Even though the story is nothing if not incredibly bleak, and the material is certainly beyond the pale, anyone watching the film won't be able to look away. The performances are all stellar, but Childers and Garner are just sublime. I haven't been that impressed with acting in a horror film in years (though again, mention must be made of Jug Face and in particular Lauren Ashley Carter). The depth of feeling they exude so effortlessly makes them seem well beyond their young years. It would be hard to choose one over the other, but if pressed I'd have to congratulate Julia Garner for her stunning and honest portrayal. She is assuredly a blossoming talent and one to watch.
Also thrown in for some relatively important pivotal scenes is Kelly McGillis in a supporting role as a caring neighbor helping the family through their grief.
The littlest Parker family member Rory (Jack Gore) is a bright little spot in an otherwise morose and weather-beaten (yet excellent) storyline that rivals any depressing period film. His life seems relatively unchanged, even without his mother. And to hear the poor little guy always complaining of being hungry certainly pulls at your heartstrings. Until, that is, you find out what's for dinner.
So don't write off this remake because it came so soon after the original 2010 Mexican thriller. If you've seen that one (as I have) you may have reservations, thinking you don't need to see another re-telling so soon. You'd be wrong. The stories differ very much, aside from the premise. And both are quite worthy of a look. But if I was being completely honest (and why wouldn't I be?), I think I prefer this Americanized version about twice as much.
Definitely one of the best of 2013. Hands down.
Movies such as The Thing (1982), Dawn of the Dead (2004), Invasion of the Body Snatchers (1978), The Fly (1986)...all of these are downright smashingly great, there's no doubt. And even to some extent, films like 2010's Let Me In showed that a re-envisioning of a movie can work, even if it's only a few years since the film has been done.
I do tend to find that sometimes if the film is foreign it's easier to experience as a remake, as Let Me In did, as well as a film from this past year that is ending up on quite a few year-end honors lists, with good reason.
We Are What We Are, directed by Jim Mickle (Stake Land, Mulberry Street), is a prime example of how to do a remake right. I was so impressed with this film from start to finish. It presents a subject so taboo in such a way that we ultimately feel sorry for the family involved, and truly hope it all works out - when in reality we should be locking them up and throwing away the key.
If you've already seen the first-rate original, then you'll know what subject I'm talking about. I don't think I'm giving anything away by telling you that the Parker family has a disturbing secret. A fairly nasty one that is steeped in their family's old-time traditions and apparently one that they (at least the father) are unwilling to deviate from.
Suffice it to say, daughters Iris (Ambyr Childers) and Rose (Julia Garner) are becoming increasingly more disenchanted with the family's customs and even more so when tragedy befalls their mother as she gathers supplies at the local market. She suffers what appears to be a stroke and meanders outside the store. Meanwhile, a serious rainstorm whips through the small town, causing flash flooding. In her confusion, she slips and falls, hitting her head and lands in a drainage ditch that swiftly fills with water, effectively drowning her in quick order.
As the Parker family grieves and makes their own special blend of homemade soup, the town doctor begins to investigate and furthermore becomes suspicious after his dog uncovers a bone that has washed up from the constant deluge plaguing the town. Naturally, it's not an animal bone, causing Doctor Barrow (the always impeccable Michael Parks, Red State) to realize there's something fishy going on in his little town. Add in the fact that there have been several people that have gone missing within a thirty mile radius of the town over the years (including the Doctor's own daughter), and he is forced to consider what the facts are blatantly telling him. He also discovers something else too bizarre to comprehend. The Parker family mother, upon autopsy, was showing signs of a rare disease known as Kuru - which is prevalent only in tribal regions of Papua New Guinea.
Google it, people.
We Are What We Are is honestly fantastic. Even though the story is nothing if not incredibly bleak, and the material is certainly beyond the pale, anyone watching the film won't be able to look away. The performances are all stellar, but Childers and Garner are just sublime. I haven't been that impressed with acting in a horror film in years (though again, mention must be made of Jug Face and in particular Lauren Ashley Carter). The depth of feeling they exude so effortlessly makes them seem well beyond their young years. It would be hard to choose one over the other, but if pressed I'd have to congratulate Julia Garner for her stunning and honest portrayal. She is assuredly a blossoming talent and one to watch.
Also thrown in for some relatively important pivotal scenes is Kelly McGillis in a supporting role as a caring neighbor helping the family through their grief.
So don't write off this remake because it came so soon after the original 2010 Mexican thriller. If you've seen that one (as I have) you may have reservations, thinking you don't need to see another re-telling so soon. You'd be wrong. The stories differ very much, aside from the premise. And both are quite worthy of a look. But if I was being completely honest (and why wouldn't I be?), I think I prefer this Americanized version about twice as much.
Definitely one of the best of 2013. Hands down.
Wednesday, January 8, 2014
Upcoming Must-Read: James Newman's 666 Hair-Raising Horror Movie Trivia Questions: Test Your Horror Acumen!
I'm not generally the type of blogger that makes a big deal about press releases and I almost never post the one sheets and DVD covers of upcoming films or books, etc. There are news sites that are custom-made for things like that, and I typically leave them to their business. But when an author I really like has something new coming out, I tend to make an exception.
James Newman - author of one of my favorite books in the last several years, The Wicked (review here) - has a new book coming out the end of this month, and I think it's something every horror fan will want to get their hands on. I have a copy of said book that I am just getting down to reading, so a review will be forthcoming, but I wanted to make mention of the formal press release, as it does explain a bit of what you're in for.
From the official press release:
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE:
NEW TRIVIA BOOK CHALLENGES GENRE FANS: “THINK YOU KNOW HORROR MOVIES? PROVE IT.”
666 HAIR-RAISING HORROR MOVIE TRIVIA QUESTIONS by James Newman
Ever been called a “weirdo” because you know more about Night of the Living Dead than you know about current events? Do people look at you funny because you have no interest in reality-TV but you can name every film in which Vincent Price appeared? Do you feel like an outsider because you’ve never cared about sports, yet you cheered at the top of your lungs when some kids played soccer with a severed head at the end of Hostel, Part 2? If you would rather visit Count Dracula’s castle than take a trip to the beach . . . if you’d prefer hanging out with Pinhead, having lunch with Leatherface, or babysitting for Rosemary instead of spending time with your real friends and family . . . this book is for YOU. Test your film knowledge with 666 Hair-Raising Horror Movie Trivia Questions compiled from over a century of genre cinema!
Now available from Post Mortem Press, 666 Hair-Raising Horror Movie Trivia Questions guarantees hours of fun for trivia-loving film fanatics who welcome a challenge. Covering the history of the genre from silent movies like Nosferatu to modern-day blockbusters like The Conjuring, no bloody stone is left unturned in this collection of questions divided into seven categories: Vampires, Zombies, Werewolves, Ghosts & Demons, Maniacs & Madmen, It Came From Another World, and Miscellaneous Madmen. In the end, fans will grade themselves against the “Who Will Survive . . . and What Will Be Left of Them?” scoring system, proving once and for all whether they’re “Just Another Victim” or a true “Master of Horror”.
Fangoria Editor Chris Alexander called 666 Hair-Raising Horror Movie Trivia Questions “a chump-stumping shock cinema party book of the highest horror order!”. Adam Minarovich (“Ed” from AMC’s The Walking Dead, screenwriter of Chop and Pawn Shop Chronicles) said “(it’s) a must-read . . . worth crawling out of your grave for!”
About the Author: James Newman has been obsessed with horror since he was just four years old, when his father took him to see The Incredible Melting Man. His published works include the novels Midnight Rain, The Wicked, Animosity, and Ugly As Sin, and the collection People Are Strange.
666 Hair-Raising Horror Movie Trivia Questions is scheduled for release on January 28, 2014. For more information visit: http://www.postmortem-press.com/666.php/, or the author’s official website: www.james-newman.com.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
This is James' first non-fiction outing, and it looks to be something special. After just reading the first few introductory pages, I know this is written by someone just like me: a crazy-obsessed horror fan whose life revolves around the next great horror film or novel.
I know this from comments like this one: "I’d be willing to bet my entire DVD collection that nobody here in my little hometown in North Carolina lives, breathes, eats, and sleeps horror movies and horror literature like I do." And this one, which I think encapsulates the reason that many of us watch horror in the first place: "When things get to be too much in the real world . . . when the bills pile up, or the boss just chewed out three-quarters of your ass . . . what better way to push it all aside than losing yourself in Seth Brundle’s infinitely worse problems in Cronenberg’s remake of The Fly? Or to laugh at Ash’s splatstick escapades in the Evil Dead series? Step away from the real world for a while, won’t you, and pray that a van full of harmless hippies guilty of nothing more than believing in astrology and picking up hitchhikers ultimately survive The Texas Chainsaw Massacre . . . ."
When someone that feels this passionately about horror gives fans the gift of something a little different, a book that challenges us fans to see just how much we know about the genre we love so much, well that's what I call a must-read. I love trivia, and when you combine that with horror, well I'm just over the moon.
After answering the first ten trivia questions (in the "vampires" category) correctly, I knew this was the book for me!
It's going to be a blast, and I hope you'll join me!
James Newman - author of one of my favorite books in the last several years, The Wicked (review here) - has a new book coming out the end of this month, and I think it's something every horror fan will want to get their hands on. I have a copy of said book that I am just getting down to reading, so a review will be forthcoming, but I wanted to make mention of the formal press release, as it does explain a bit of what you're in for.
From the official press release:
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE:
NEW TRIVIA BOOK CHALLENGES GENRE FANS: “THINK YOU KNOW HORROR MOVIES? PROVE IT.”
666 HAIR-RAISING HORROR MOVIE TRIVIA QUESTIONS by James Newman
Ever been called a “weirdo” because you know more about Night of the Living Dead than you know about current events? Do people look at you funny because you have no interest in reality-TV but you can name every film in which Vincent Price appeared? Do you feel like an outsider because you’ve never cared about sports, yet you cheered at the top of your lungs when some kids played soccer with a severed head at the end of Hostel, Part 2? If you would rather visit Count Dracula’s castle than take a trip to the beach . . . if you’d prefer hanging out with Pinhead, having lunch with Leatherface, or babysitting for Rosemary instead of spending time with your real friends and family . . . this book is for YOU. Test your film knowledge with 666 Hair-Raising Horror Movie Trivia Questions compiled from over a century of genre cinema!
Now available from Post Mortem Press, 666 Hair-Raising Horror Movie Trivia Questions guarantees hours of fun for trivia-loving film fanatics who welcome a challenge. Covering the history of the genre from silent movies like Nosferatu to modern-day blockbusters like The Conjuring, no bloody stone is left unturned in this collection of questions divided into seven categories: Vampires, Zombies, Werewolves, Ghosts & Demons, Maniacs & Madmen, It Came From Another World, and Miscellaneous Madmen. In the end, fans will grade themselves against the “Who Will Survive . . . and What Will Be Left of Them?” scoring system, proving once and for all whether they’re “Just Another Victim” or a true “Master of Horror”.
Fangoria Editor Chris Alexander called 666 Hair-Raising Horror Movie Trivia Questions “a chump-stumping shock cinema party book of the highest horror order!”. Adam Minarovich (“Ed” from AMC’s The Walking Dead, screenwriter of Chop and Pawn Shop Chronicles) said “(it’s) a must-read . . . worth crawling out of your grave for!”
About the Author: James Newman has been obsessed with horror since he was just four years old, when his father took him to see The Incredible Melting Man. His published works include the novels Midnight Rain, The Wicked, Animosity, and Ugly As Sin, and the collection People Are Strange.
666 Hair-Raising Horror Movie Trivia Questions is scheduled for release on January 28, 2014. For more information visit: http://www.postmortem-press.com/666.php/, or the author’s official website: www.james-newman.com.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
This is James' first non-fiction outing, and it looks to be something special. After just reading the first few introductory pages, I know this is written by someone just like me: a crazy-obsessed horror fan whose life revolves around the next great horror film or novel.
I know this from comments like this one: "I’d be willing to bet my entire DVD collection that nobody here in my little hometown in North Carolina lives, breathes, eats, and sleeps horror movies and horror literature like I do." And this one, which I think encapsulates the reason that many of us watch horror in the first place: "When things get to be too much in the real world . . . when the bills pile up, or the boss just chewed out three-quarters of your ass . . . what better way to push it all aside than losing yourself in Seth Brundle’s infinitely worse problems in Cronenberg’s remake of The Fly? Or to laugh at Ash’s splatstick escapades in the Evil Dead series? Step away from the real world for a while, won’t you, and pray that a van full of harmless hippies guilty of nothing more than believing in astrology and picking up hitchhikers ultimately survive The Texas Chainsaw Massacre . . . ."
When someone that feels this passionately about horror gives fans the gift of something a little different, a book that challenges us fans to see just how much we know about the genre we love so much, well that's what I call a must-read. I love trivia, and when you combine that with horror, well I'm just over the moon.
After answering the first ten trivia questions (in the "vampires" category) correctly, I knew this was the book for me!
It's going to be a blast, and I hope you'll join me!
Monday, January 6, 2014
Mindless Movie Monday: The Secret Village (Warning: You'll Fall Asleep Before The Secret Is Revealed!)
While the premise of The Secret Village (beautiful young journalist seeks headline story by investigating the sinister history of a small town) seems intriguing, this film is pretty much a dud from the word go. I truly believe that anyone that would give this film an outstanding review is either related to someone who worked on the film or has quite possibly fallen and hit their head.
Rachel (Ali Faulkner) is a journalist that is staying in a small western Massachusetts town so she can look into some apparent ergot poisonings and other strange happenings that occurred as recently as a few years ago. (Of note is the fact that back in 1692, ergot poisoning was thought to be the cause of the apparent "bewitchments" of several young girls that eventually led to the deaths of proclaimed witches in Salem village.)
No one in the village wants to talk to Rachel except Paul (Richard Riehle), who warns her people will not want her snooping around. He agrees to give her some back story but almost as soon as he starts talking, he winds up dead.
There are lots of folks walking around in black ritual cloaks, a freaky ghost-type woman who is in desperate need of a hair appointment, and mysterious strangers leaving notes on Rachel's door warning her to leave town. Borrring!
Rachel has a new friend, Greg (Jonathan Bennett) - a screenwriter who at the beginning of the film moves into the adjoining room of her rented house to work on his script. By the halfway point they are kissing and getting to know each other better, which feels just a little too convenient. When she divulges the mystery she's working on to him, he soon disappears, leaving her alone to face the "pure evil" alluded to on the cover of the DVD. Yeah, not so much.
The film just meanders on at such a ridiculously slow pace that you could probably could read a magazine or even do your taxes and not miss anything. There's a lot of walking around in the woods, searching houses for clues, mundane chase scenes, people injecting others with mysterious liquids in syringes, and basically a whole not of nothing going on. Not in the least bit frightening, I honestly could have fallen asleep several times. Zero zero zero thrills!
The acting is completely wooden, with sadly not one actor really having any redeeming quality about them. I really think most of the problem is the lame script, but the cast didn't seem to be able to pull themselves out of the abyss and make the material any better. The lead actress is doing her best to look like Kristen Stewart, and perhaps she's hitting her mark in her quest to emulate her, for there are countless surprised expressions and rolling eyes, but no actual depth of feeling or acting chops to speak of.
Perhaps the worst element of the movie is the ghastly soundtrack. With polarizing blasts of sci-fi-esque tones that have no real theme, it is just awful. It matched nothing going on in the film, and the sound editing was awful as well, with loud and obnoxious noises combining with quiet dialogue you can barely hear.
I won't discuss the twist at the end because it's just not worthy of a mention.
I seriously had trouble getting through this movie. It was SO lackluster that when my husband came home from work and saw me trying not to pull my hair out he asked why I didn't just turn the damn thing off. But I have sat through this crap-fest so that you don't have to. Take my word for it.
Two thumbs down.
Rachel (Ali Faulkner) is a journalist that is staying in a small western Massachusetts town so she can look into some apparent ergot poisonings and other strange happenings that occurred as recently as a few years ago. (Of note is the fact that back in 1692, ergot poisoning was thought to be the cause of the apparent "bewitchments" of several young girls that eventually led to the deaths of proclaimed witches in Salem village.)
No one in the village wants to talk to Rachel except Paul (Richard Riehle), who warns her people will not want her snooping around. He agrees to give her some back story but almost as soon as he starts talking, he winds up dead.There are lots of folks walking around in black ritual cloaks, a freaky ghost-type woman who is in desperate need of a hair appointment, and mysterious strangers leaving notes on Rachel's door warning her to leave town. Borrring!
The film just meanders on at such a ridiculously slow pace that you could probably could read a magazine or even do your taxes and not miss anything. There's a lot of walking around in the woods, searching houses for clues, mundane chase scenes, people injecting others with mysterious liquids in syringes, and basically a whole not of nothing going on. Not in the least bit frightening, I honestly could have fallen asleep several times. Zero zero zero thrills!
The acting is completely wooden, with sadly not one actor really having any redeeming quality about them. I really think most of the problem is the lame script, but the cast didn't seem to be able to pull themselves out of the abyss and make the material any better. The lead actress is doing her best to look like Kristen Stewart, and perhaps she's hitting her mark in her quest to emulate her, for there are countless surprised expressions and rolling eyes, but no actual depth of feeling or acting chops to speak of.
Perhaps the worst element of the movie is the ghastly soundtrack. With polarizing blasts of sci-fi-esque tones that have no real theme, it is just awful. It matched nothing going on in the film, and the sound editing was awful as well, with loud and obnoxious noises combining with quiet dialogue you can barely hear.
I won't discuss the twist at the end because it's just not worthy of a mention.
I seriously had trouble getting through this movie. It was SO lackluster that when my husband came home from work and saw me trying not to pull my hair out he asked why I didn't just turn the damn thing off. But I have sat through this crap-fest so that you don't have to. Take my word for it.
Two thumbs down.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)















































